{"created":"2023-05-15T10:11:30.448633+00:00","id":1103,"links":{},"metadata":{"_buckets":{"deposit":"6b667761-bf6d-42f9-9ad9-61d5c3e7b098"},"_deposit":{"created_by":1,"id":"1103","owners":[1],"pid":{"revision_id":0,"type":"depid","value":"1103"},"status":"published"},"_oai":{"id":"oai:meio-u.repo.nii.ac.jp:00001103","sets":["62:84"]},"author_link":["2336"],"item_8_alternative_title_1":{"attribute_name":"その他（別言語等）のタイトル","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_alternative_title":"An Inquiry into Analytical Measurement of Achievement Objectives of Argumentative Report in Undergraduate First Year \"Report Writing Class\""}]},"item_8_biblio_info_22":{"attribute_name":"書誌情報","attribute_value_mlt":[{"bibliographicIssueNumber":"16","bibliographicPageEnd":"91","bibliographicPageStart":"77","bibliographic_titles":[{}]}]},"item_8_description_8":{"attribute_name":"内容記述","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_description":"本調査の目的は初年次対象｢レポート作成論｣における論述文の到達目標を分析的に評価することにより、到達目標の課題や将来の方向性を探ることを狙いとする。本調査は、｢レポート作成論｣を受講した学生の中から28名を抽出して調査をした。学生は、同一の評価項目に沿って、最初の講義と最後の講義で自己評価を行った。教師はレポートを読んで、学生と同一の評価項目で評価を行い、学生の評価結果と比べた。調査結果は次のとおりである。第1に、反証文献の活用と文章の結束、文章中の引用の書き方や剽窃においてレポート作成の弱点が指摘された。第2に、学生の事前評価と事後評価では全員が伸長を示したのは、文献リストの書き方や句読点・文字数である。第3に教員の評価においても、学生の評価においても個人の異なる基準や、同一者測定による結果の信頼性などが指摘された。第4に、分析的評価と全体的評価のバランスについての問題指摘がなされた。最後に、最終成果物のみではなく、プロセスの活動はどのように到達度評価に含まれるのか指摘がなされた。","subitem_description_type":"Other"},{"subitem_description":"The purpose of this paper is to evaluate current problems in achievement assessment and possible solutions by analyzing achievement objectives of argumentative essay writing in university freshman's \"Report Writing Class\". This study used a sample of 28 students who took \"Report Writing Class\". The students assessed their own  achievement, using the same criteria before the first class and after the final class. The teacher similarly used the same criteria used by students after reading their final essays. The student's results and teacher's results are compared and contrasted. The results of the study are as follows. Firstly, the students showed weaknesses in the areas of plagiarism, citing in the passage and cohesion of sentence. Secondly, according to pre/post results, the students showed most progress regarding listingcited works and instructions for writing numbers and English in Japanese language. Thirdly, both assessment by the teacher and assessment by the students showed assessment results were not always consistent and reliable due to varying individual student's criteria standard and non-repeated assessment of the teacher. Lastly, combining analytic assessment and holistic assessment was considered to measure achievement objectives. Moreover, how the processing of writing can be added to achievement assessment was argued.","subitem_description_type":"Other"}]},"item_8_publisher_10":{"attribute_name":"公開者・出版者","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_publisher":"名桜大学"}]},"item_8_rights_12":{"attribute_name":"権利","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_rights":"名桜大学"}]},"item_8_source_id_6":{"attribute_name":"ISSN","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_source_identifier":"1882-4412","subitem_source_identifier_type":"ISSN"}]},"item_8_text_11":{"attribute_name":"公開者別名","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_text_value":"PUBLISHED BY MEIO UNIVERSITY"}]},"item_8_text_15":{"attribute_name":"タイプ","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_text_value":"紀要論文"}]},"item_8_text_16":{"attribute_name":"NIIタイプ","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_text_value":"Departmental Bulletin Paper"}]},"item_8_text_17":{"attribute_name":"DCMI","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_text_value":"text"}]},"item_8_text_18":{"attribute_name":"収録種別","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_text_value":"紀要論文"}]},"item_8_text_19":{"attribute_name":"収録種別","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_text_value":"02"}]},"item_8_text_20":{"attribute_name":"収録雑誌名","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_text_value":"名桜大学紀要 = THE MEIO UNIVERSITY BULLETIN"}]},"item_8_text_21":{"attribute_name":"NII書誌ID","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_text_value":"AN10512334"}]},"item_8_text_25":{"attribute_name":"著者所属","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_text_value":"名桜大学国際学群"}]},"item_8_text_4":{"attribute_name":"別言語の著者","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_text_value":"Tokeshi, Masanori"}]},"item_8_text_5":{"attribute_name":"作成日","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_text_value":"2011-07"}]},"item_8_version_type_24":{"attribute_name":"著者版フラグ","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_version_resource":"http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85","subitem_version_type":"VoR"}]},"item_access_right":{"attribute_name":"アクセス権","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_access_right":"metadata only access","subitem_access_right_uri":"http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_14cb"}]},"item_creator":{"attribute_name":"著者","attribute_type":"creator","attribute_value_mlt":[{"creatorNames":[{"creatorName":"渡慶次, 正則"}],"nameIdentifiers":[{"nameIdentifier":"2336","nameIdentifierScheme":"WEKO"}]}]},"item_language":{"attribute_name":"言語","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_language":"jpn"}]},"item_resource_type":{"attribute_name":"資源タイプ","attribute_value_mlt":[{"resourcetype":"departmental bulletin paper","resourceuri":"http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501"}]},"item_title":"初年次｢レポート作成論｣における論述文到達目標の分析的測定の検証","item_titles":{"attribute_name":"タイトル","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_title":"初年次｢レポート作成論｣における論述文到達目標の分析的測定の検証"}]},"item_type_id":"8","owner":"1","path":["84"],"pubdate":{"attribute_name":"公開日","attribute_value":"2012-03-05"},"publish_date":"2012-03-05","publish_status":"0","recid":"1103","relation_version_is_last":true,"title":["初年次｢レポート作成論｣における論述文到達目標の分析的測定の検証"],"weko_creator_id":"1","weko_shared_id":-1},"updated":"2023-05-15T10:27:53.791070+00:00"}