@article{oai:meio-u.repo.nii.ac.jp:00001274,
 author = {嘉数, 啓},
 issue = {20},
 month = {2020-12-03},
 note = {David Ricardoの比較優位理論(1817)以来、自由で公正な国際貿易は「成長のエンジン」として理論的にも実証的にも確認されてきた。事実、ルールに沿った国際貿易は、それぞれの国・地域が比較優位性のある貿易商品に特化し、輸出することによって、先進工業国、発展途上国を問わず所得水準の向上と雇用の拡大に貢献してきた。自由で公正な貿易を促進する機関として世界貿易機構(WTO)があるが、その加盟国の大半は発展途上国である。国際貿易の主役は、大西洋から太平洋に移り、今や中国を中心とするアジアに移っている。貿易で躍進するアジアの成長エネルギーを日本、特にアジアに近接する沖縄がいかに取り込んでいくかが今後の大きな課題となる。本論は、国際貿易を促進する新たな動きとして活発に議論されている2国間(EPA)、或いは多国間(TPP)の経済連携協力の現状を活写し、日本及び沖縄の進路を示す。沖縄の場合は、TPPアプローチより、成長の三角地帯(GT)アプローチの方がより明るい展望につながることを示す。, Nobel laureate, Paul A. Samuelson took several years to find an answer to mathematical genius Stanislaw Ulam's challenging question, "Name me one proposition in all of the social sciences which is both true and non-trivial." Samuelson's answer was "comparative advantage." Since the doctrine was first expounded by David Ricardo in 1817, it became a gospel of both theoretical economists and practitioners. An open and trading system based upon multilaterally agreed rules is simple enough and rests largely on commercial common sense. According to the World Trade Organization (WTO), the system is also supported by the experience of world trade and economic growth since the Second World War. The weight of international trade, which has been an engine of growth, has shifted from the Atlantic to the Pacific where East Asia has become its main engine. Okinawa needs to capture trade-induced prosperity for its future development. This paper discusses the latest developments of international trade focusing on economic partnership agreement (EPA) and trans-pacific partnership agreement (TPP) which have been hotly debated in Japan and Okinawa since mid-2011. For Okinawa, the growth triangle approach (GT) has more merits than the TPP approach., application/pdf},
 pages = {17--38},
 title = {東アジア経済連携構想と日本・沖縄の経済戦略},
 year = {}
}